The courtroom is an amalgam of marbled history and modern imposition, where the alabaster veins of the former bleed into the sleek severity of the latter. As I am ushered in, the stately chamber looms before me, a coliseum of judgment decked in the austere trappings of jurisprudence. The air itself seems to congeal with the gravitas of the occasion, laden with the anticipatory hush of those gathered within.
I see rows of wooden pews, their polished surfaces mirroring the uniformed bailiffs who flank the aisles, their postures taut with the discipline of their office. Lead smocks drape the shoulders of the few who deem their proximity to me a risk worth mitigating. Their rustling movements are a dissonant symphony played to an audience of angst and intrigue.
My sensors, unimpeded by the fears and formalities that govern flesh and blood, scan the room–a theater of law with the flag standing sentinel beside the mahogany bench, the judge’s yet unoccupied throne. Above, the seal of the nation gazes down, an impartial witness to the proceedings, and I am struck by the emblem’s ironic permanence in the sea of transitory human affairs.
As I stand encased in my mechanical chrysalis, the world beyond the courtroom’s stained-glass windows beckons–a tableau vivant of media scavengers, spectators, and silhouettes etched against the bright tumult of flash photography. They are but muffled shadows, their presence an omnipresent hum that vibrates against the pane–a distorted representation of the court of public opinion that swirls around the name Chernobyl.
Jerry Caldwell is a monolith amidst the tempest, his presence at my side both grounding and disquieting. His visage is a fortress of calm, and I find a measure of solace in the notion that my fate rests in hands as capable as his. He shares no words, his stance a sermon of silent support that speaks more eloquently than any exhortation.
Within my suit, I am insulated from the bedlam, yet acutely tuned to the collective pulse of the room. A maelstrom of conjecture and clandestine judgment roils beneath the surface–a current of unspoken sentiment that I navigate with the detachment of a scholar observing an experiment of great consequence.
In the gallery, the spectators and advocates are a mosaic of the invested and the idle, a confluence of agendas and curiosities playing out in hushed tones and covert glances. The vibrant tapestry of humanity before me is a stark contrast to the isolation of my existence, the two separated by an unseen, but nonetheless palpable, barrier.
The drone of my power systems is a metronome to the steady ingress of participants–prosecutor, defense, bailiff, and stenographer each taking their appointed place like pieces on a chessboard, their roles defined by the intricate dance of legal stratagem.
As I take my place, the weight of my choices, past and present, descends upon me with the inexorable gravity of my situation. Here, before the eyes of the law and the watchful gaze of the world, I am a fulcrum on which the scales of power, ethics, and accountability shall pivot. The burden of these truths is a crucible I accept, even as the disquieting prospect of my future unfurls before me.
I am ready, a statue within a monument to human order, to face the cacophony of justice and the quiet reckonings of the soul that shall follow. And as the judge enters and the room rises, I find a strand of hope, resilient and defiant, threading through the solemnity–a conviction that today’s proceedings may yet mark the genesis of my penance and the road to absolution.
Jerry leans toward me, his presence a towering bastion amidst the disarray of legal machinations. Even within the confines of the courtroom, filled to the brim with eyes that judge and mouths that whisper, there exists a pocket of space where strategy and foresight reign supreme.
“Mr. Fedorov,” Jerry begins, his voice low and imbued with the kind of intensity that commands attention. It’s a timbre that betrays none of the stress that must surely cling to him. “You understand everything we talked about earlier?”
I nod, the subtle whir of my suit’s mechanisms punctuating the gesture. “I comprehend the stakes, Mr. Caldwell. To-“
He interjects, his hand raised in a silent gesture urging precision. “Not just any explanation. We argue that your actions, while unlawful, were taken to avoid greater harm. Your life, the lives of others, the integrity of your suit.”
The notion feels foreign, like a concept borrowed from a life less encumbered by the weight of decisions made in extremis. But there’s a sagacity to Jerry’s approach, a threading of the needle through the fabric of law and morality that could suture the past to a more hopeful outcome.
“Our aim is for the court to see the context, the full picture. Your cooperation with… that organization, the lives saved by the power you’ve provided.” Jerry’s eyes flicker with a steely resolve. “Your humanity, Illya.”
His words are a catalyst, transmuting the air around us into a charged matrix where the possibilities of law and the physics of human compassion intersect.
“I have no illusions regarding the court’s perception of my actions,” I respond, the harmonic distortion of my voicebox translating my sentiment into digitized sound waves, a volume low enough to only be heard by my counsel. “And yet, I–“
The clatter of the bailiff’s voice cuts through the murmured strategy session. “All rise.”
Jerry straightens, the lines of his suit settling as he assumes the mantle of advocate once more. He offers me a final, firm nod–a silent semaphore that conveys a shared conviction in the path we’ve chosen.
As the room heaves with the rustling symphony of bodies and robes, I remain stationary within my suit, my armored form a singular exception to the protocol that commands the flesh.
The judge assumes his position, his gavel a silent testament to the authority vested in him. The arraignment is about to commence, and with it, the first steps into the crucible that will test the mettle of not just one man encased in a suit of containment, but the spirit of justice itself. Jerry has laid out the board, the pieces are in motion, and I steel myself for the play of legal gambits about to unfold. The strategy is set; now comes the execution.
As the room settles into a state of watchful silence, punctuated by the occasional shuffle of feet and the scratch of the court reporter’s keystrokes, Judge Harold Bennett’s voice resonates with the timbre of authority honed by years on the bench. His stern countenance surveys the courtroom, the embodiment of the law’s immutable gaze.
“Mr. Fedorov,” the judge intones, his eyes meeting mine through the pane of my helmet’s visor. “You are here to be arraigned on multiple charges. You have the right to be informed of these charges, the right to counsel, the right to remain silent, and the right to a fair trial. Do you understand these rights as I have explained them to you?”
A nod from within my containment suit, slow and deliberate, acknowledges the litany of rights–an echo of the countless courtroom dramas etched into the public consciousness. “I do, Your Honor,” I affirm, my voice a modulated baritone that does not betray the simmering cauldron of thoughts and calculations beneath.
Judge Bennett’s eyes, hardened by the gravity of his role, remain fixed upon me. “Mr. Fedorov, you are formally charged with two counts of murder in the second degree, specifically relating to the deaths of Professor Franklin and Liberty Belle. Additionally, you face four counts of theft, including the unauthorized acquisition of industrial components and technology. There are also three counts of property damage exceeding $500,000 in total value. Furthermore, you are charged with the illegal generation and release of hazardous materials, endangering public health and safety. Lastly, your actions have incurred seven counts of unlicensed utilization of superhuman abilities, particularly in the commission the aforementioned offenses. These charges are serious and carry significant legal consequences. Do you comprehend the charges as I have detailed them?”
The list hangs in the air, a spectral indictment that catalogues years of skirmishes, necessity, and survival. Each charge is a ghost from my past, its whisper a reminder of the burden I carry and the restitution I seek. “I understand the charges, Your Honor,” I reply, each word measured, the product of a mind that has long accepted the inevitability of this moment. “I am prepared to answer for my actions before the court.”
The judge nods, his expression inscrutable as he takes note of my affirmation. “Given the nature of these charges and the complexity of this case,” he begins, his gaze sweeping across the array of faces, “we will proceed with the utmost diligence and attention to detail. The court recognizes the unique circumstances at play, given the unusual conditions of your containment and, as I have been informed, matters of classified national security. Additionally, as your counsel has informed us, you have voluntarily declined even the possibility of bail, and wish to remain in custody until the conclusion of your trial. Is this correct?”
The room absorbs his words, a collective breath held as the scales of justice wobble under the weight of their own precedent. The notion of diligence, of a court navigating the uncharted waters of superhuman legality, is both a promise and a portent.
“Indeed, Your Honor,” I reply, a stalwart resonance in my mechanized declamation. “Given the inherent risk my… condition poses to others, I find it only prudent to remain within a secure facility throughout the legal proceedings. My freedom should not come at the cost of public safety.”
The assembly of listeners, rapt in the unfolding discourse, seems to lean into the magnitude of my concession–a villain, it would appear, volunteering for chains. My words, however, are not born of self-flagellation but of a calculated recognition of the variables at play–my powers, my past, and the path to whatever redemption may yet be mine.
“I have, furthermore, facilitated the engineering of a specialized containment cell,” I continue, the weight of my gaze meeting that of the judge. “I have provided detailed schematics to the local enforcement authorities to mitigate–“
Judge Bennett raises a hand–steady, an extension of the court’s will to regulate the flow of testimony. “Mr. Fedorov, while your cooperation is noted and appreciated, the details of your containment during incarceration are not the subject of this arraignment. We will consider the schematics you have submitted and other related security measures in due course. For now, let us focus on the matter at hand.”
His interruption, precise and devoid of malice, is a guiding force shepherding the discourse back to the procedural tracks laid down by legal tradition. It is a reminder that while my voice is heard, it must also bow to the decorum this arena demands.
I acquiesce with a nod, the soft whirr of my suit’s mechanisms punctuating the silent gesture of compliance. “Of course, Your Honor,” I concede, acknowledging the boundaries within which this ballet of justice pirouettes. There is a time for every argument, and this moment, it seems, is reserved for the sober recitation of charges and the acknowledgment of my understanding thereof.
The courtroom holds its breath, the stillness punctuated only by the soft click of the court reporter’s keys, documenting this view of justice poised at the edge of revelation. There is a theatrical hush that envelopes the chamber, the anticipatory silence one might find in the audience as the maestro raises his baton, the orchestra at the ready.
With deliberation and a practiced air of solemnity, Judge Bennett turns his gaze upon me once more, his voice the harbinger of decision. “Mr. Federov,” he asks, the cadence of his speech steady and expectant, “how do you plead to these charges?”
The court waits, every eye fixed upon the armored silhouette that is both defendant and enigma. Yet, within the confines of my containment suit, there is no clamor of internal debate, no swell of dramatics to draw out the tension. There is only the steady thrum of cognition, the well-rehearsed clarity of purpose forged in the crucible of decision that preceded this moment.
“Not guilty, Your Honor,” comes my reply, swift and devoid of hesitation–the product of many nights’ contemplation and the meticulous crafting of my defense strategy. The words are not a denial of my actions, for the weight of history is not so easily shed, but a rejection of the narrative that has painted me solely as a menace, as a villain devoid of nuance.
I understand what I am saying. I do know that I have killed. But I did not have a choice.
The reaction is immediate, a ripple that traverses the courtroom like a wave washing over a beach of onlookers and participants. The phrase ‘not guilty’ reverberates against the marbled walls, a defiance of expectation that stirs the waters of public and private conscience alike. There is no triumph in my plea, no smugness or subterfuge–it is a statement of fact, a testament to a conviction deeper than the charges arrayed against me.
The gavel strikes, a crisp punctuation that quells the burgeoning murmur of the gallery as Judge Bennett regains command of the proceedings. He surveys the court with an air of methodical resolve, the stillness that follows his admonishment serving as a canvas for his next words.
“Let’s outline the schedule for you, Mr. Federov,” he declares, the sharpness of his gaze a beacon cutting through the haze of speculation and uncertainty. “The court is fully aware of the complexities this case presents, and so we will adhere strictly to a timetable that allows for thorough preparation and examination.”
He shuffles through his papers, each movement deliberate, as the court reporter’s keys clack rhythmically, capturing this symphony of order and process for posterity. His voice, steady as the ticking of a grandfather clock, sets the tempo for what is to come.
“All pre-trial motions must be filed by April 1st, 2024,” he articulates with the precision of a maestro conducting his orchestra. “This includes motions to dismiss, motions for a change of venue, and any motions regarding evidence. Counsel for both the defense and the prosecution should note this deadline and ensure compliance.”
The date etches itself into my mind, another waypoint on the path to judgment. I register the nod from Jerry, his assurance solid in the sea of legal machinations that churn around us. He’s taking notes. I’m not.
“The deadline for completion of discovery, including the exchange of all relevant evidence and witness lists, is set for May 15th, 2024,” Judge Bennett continues, his voice a lodestar in the murk of litigation. “It is imperative that this process is concluded without delay to maintain the integrity and pace of these proceedings.”
Within my suit, the hum of my systems is a metronomic echo to his words–a reminder that time, while seemingly abstract, is the currency with which we barter for justice.
“A status hearing is scheduled for June 5th, 2024, to address any issues arising during discovery,” he states, the future taking shape in the form of legal landmarks dotting the horizon. “Counsel should be prepared to discuss the progress and any concerns that may warrant the court’s attention. The pre-trial conference will take place on July 20th, 2024, to finalize preparations for trial,” he continues, the gravity of his office lending weight to the occasion. “By this time, all matters regarding witnesses, evidence, and legal strategies should be resolved to ensure a smooth transition into the trial phase.”
The trial phase. Where my fate lies.
“The trial is scheduled to begin on August 15th, 2024,” the judge concludes, the date a distant drumbeat that signals the culmination of all that has led to this point. “Ensure all parties are prepared to proceed. We will not suffer delays or grandstanding. This will be a trial by the book, measured and reflective of the severity it is due.”
August 15th.
Judgement.
“Given the unique circumstances of your detention, arrangements have been made for your secure transport back to the holding facility,” he adds, his voice a touch softer now, a nod to the reality that even in the pursuit of justice, humanity must not be forsaken. “You will remain in custody there until the trial, with all necessary precautions in place to ensure your containment and the safety of the public. You are free to discuss your schematics and possible transfer to a more well-equipped facility with your counsel, who will get the information to the proper authorities.”
I am a ship at anchor, resigned to the harbor of confinement, yet resolute in the face of the storm to come. My suit–a vessel of both protection and imprisonment–will be my chrysalis until either justice is served or redemption is found within the halls of law. As the judge’s words dissipate into the charged air, the court begins its orchestrated disassembly. The rhythm of the process pushes forward, even as the gravity of my situation anchors me firmly to the present, to the reality of my plight. Methodical. Relentless.
I am ready to return to the solitude of my containment, armed with the knowledge of the battlefield that lies before me. I nod at Jerry. He gives me a tight-lipped smile. The scripted ceremony of the arraignment reaches its denouement, the players poised for the final act. My thoughts, divorced from the immediate choreography of courtroom protocol, delve into the calculations that have become my refuge. A haven of equations and variables where the world makes sense.
“Mr. Fedorov, let me be clear,” Judge Bennett intones, his eyes alight with the fire of his office. “You have the right to a fair trial, the right to be represented by an attorney, and the right to remain silent. These rights are the pillars upon which our justice system is built, and they will be upheld with the utmost rigor throughout these proceedings.”
His words, a litany of assurances, resonate within the confines of my suit. They are the keystones of a fair trial, a trial I have sought as much for vindication as for atonement. My mind, ever analytical, accepts these declarations, weighing them like so many elements on the periodic table: fundamental and immutable.
“Are there any immediate questions or concerns from the parties before we conclude?” Judge Bennett asks, his glance sweeping across the courtroom like a lighthouse beam, seeking out the shadows where doubt might linger.
A brief silence ensues, a collective breath held before the plunge. Jerry Caldwell stands, his form a bastion of quiet strength, and shakes his head. “No, Your Honor. The defense is clear on the next steps.”
The prosecutor, Anne-Marie Gibson, echoes the sentiment with a curt nod, her demeanor as sharp as the suit she wears. “There are no questions from the prosecution, Your Honor,” she says. The other players in this orchestrated drama signal their understanding, their acquiescence to the timetables and requirements set forth.
“Very well,” Judge Bennett concludes, his gavel poised like the sword of Damocles. With a final decisive strike, the arraignment is officially closed–the verdict of the court’s procedural might.
The bailiff steps forward, a silent sentinel whose eyes betray a flicker of empathy beneath the stoic mask of duty. “Mr. Fedorov, if you’ll come with us,” he says, his voice devoid of the rancor one might expect in addressing an accused villain.
I rise, my movements precise, the servos and hydraulics of my suit responding with a synchrony born of countless recalibrations. As I stand, the courtroom’s denizens watch, a menagerie of emotions playing across their faces. Curiosity, fear, anticipation. In their eyes, I see the reflection of my own journey, a path defined by a search for power and punctuated by the inexorable march of consequence.
The transportation is as discrete as it is secure. An armored truck with walls as thick as the secrets it harbors, reinforced per my instructions. The law enforcement officers, specially trained for the task, handle the operation with professionalism that borders on reverence, a dance with the devil they know to be a man. My suit, a relic of both my salvation and my curse, is secured within the vehicle, hidden behind layers of material to prevent the driver and their passengers from dying ten years down the road.
And so I return to the containment that has become my crucible, my hermitage, my sanctuary. Here, within the bowels of human construction, I will await the trial and the judgment of my peers. Today, the world has glimpsed the man behind the myth, the soul within the suit, if only for a moment. The relentless pursuit of a reunification that beckons like a distant star.
Enter your email and click the below “Subscribe” button to subscribe to updates.
Chum will update every Wednesday, with sporadic extra updates as I feel fit. To stay up to date with Chum, consider joining the Official Discord™️. If clicking that link is difficult, you can manually access it with the following invite: https://discord.gg/QHy8YM99vC
Comments, feedback, theorizing, speculation, questions, etc. are all greatly appreciated. Additionally, if you enjoy Chum and would like to offer your financial support, you can find my Patreon at https://patreon.com/bearsharktopus, or donate a one-time donation at https://paypal.me/bstdev.
Chum 
One response to “IF.3”
didn’t know courtroom drama could be so appealing! good job!
LikeLike